Organism-specific therapeutic regimens for septic arthritis (SA)of prosthetic joints, or periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), are provided below, including those for methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), methicillin-resistant S aureus (MRSA), coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS), penicillin-sensitive and penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae,[1] gram-negative rods, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, as well as special considerations.[2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
Orally administered antibiotics should not be part of either the empiric or organism specific regimens for SA. In general, a switch over to PO agents should be considered when there is documentation that the infection is responding to treatment(see below).
A study involving native and prosthetic joint infections found that orally administered antibiotics started within 7 days of instituting IV therapy were noninferior to antibiotics administered intravenously through the entire therapeutic course (13% and 15%, respectively). The primary pathogens included S aureus (38%), coagulase-negative staphylococci (27%), and Streptococcus species (15%). Sixty-one percent had prosthetic-related infections. Rifampin was given to 41% of the IV group and 56% of the PO group.
For initial oral treatment, the pathogen must be sensitive to antibiotics and have superior GI absorption, and the patient should be without any major suppurative complications that would require surgery. These results need to be confirmed by follow-up studies. This study may be useful in justifying switchover to PO antibiotics earlier than has been done in the past.[10]
It is important to emphasize that the duration of antibiotic therapy for a given patient is dependent on that individual's clinical response to the provided medical and surgical care. This needs to be regularly assessed by the results of serial focused physical examinations; appropriate imaging studies; and pertinent cultures of tissue, blood, and joint fluid. Experience has shown that the studies are relatively insensitive indicators. Many, such as sedimentation rate or WBC, may improve or normalize in chronically infected bone or periprosthetic tissue. This leads to delays in necessary surgery. Support is growing for following inflammatory markers such as CRP or procalcitonin as more reliable indicators of active infection.[11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16]
Vancomycin has been the traditional drug to administer to those with severe beta-lactam allergies and as treatment of CoNS and MRSA. Because of challenges in maintaining therapeutic levels(trough levels of 5-12 mcg/ml) in the severely ill and an evolving pattern of resistance, vancomycin is no longer the author's "go to" choice.
*Rifampin must always be part of the antibiotic regime for treating staphylococcal PJI.{11}
The following medications are given for MSSA
The following medications are given for MRSA:
The following medications are given for CoNS:
The following medications are given for penicillin-sensitive Streptococcus pneumoniae:
The following medications are given for penicillin-resistant S pneumoniae:
The following medications are given for gram-negative rods other than Pseudomonas:
The following medications are given for Pseudomonas aeruginosa:
Because the length of therapy is so prolonged, there is a real possibility that significant side effects of the initial choices will lead to significant side effects or resistance patterns.
Certain cases of PJI cannot be cured but need to be suppressed. The pharmacokinetics of dalbavancin (see below) make its use attractive in such cases.
Aztreonam 2 gm IV q12h is useful in patients with severe beta-lactam allergy who have sensitive Gram-negatives
Ceftazidime/avibactam 2.5 gm IV q8h is useful in highly resistant Gram-negative, especially Pseudomonas
Dalbavancin[17] Loading dose 1500 mg IV times x1, then 500 mg IV every 7 days
Special considerations include the following:
Specific antibiotic choices should always be made with consideration of the antibiotic stewardship plan of the facility.