Growth Plate (Physeal) Fractures Treatment & Management

Updated: Sep 26, 2019
  • Author: Steven I Rabin, MD, FAAOS; Chief Editor: Jeffrey D Thomson, MD  more...
  • Print
Treatment

Approach Considerations

Salter-Harris (SH) I and SH II growth plate (physeal) injuries usually can be managed adequately with closed manipulative reduction. Upon reduction, these injuries are typically stable, and casting suffices. At times, periosteal flaps or other local tissue may interpose into the fracture site and inhibit complete reduction. This complication may necessitate surgical extraction of the tissues to enable satisfactory or anatomic reduction. [8, 19]

SH III and SH IV injuries represent disruption of the physis and the epiphysis, as well as intra-articular fracture. Intra-articular discontinuity can lead to early degenerative arthritis, and physeal discontinuity can disturb longitudinal growth. According to Bright, [19]  proper management of SH III and SH IV injuries requires anatomic reduction and internal fixation to restore anatomic alignment of the joint surfaces and proper alignment of juxtaposing physeal surfaces. In many cases, nondisplaced fracture fragments have migrated subsequent to cast immobilization only.

SH V and VI injuries often result in partial or complete growth arrest (physeal bar formation). As a result, physeal bar resection may be required, or other surgical procedures may be necessary to prevent or correct deformity. [9]

Absolute contraindications for reduction of displaced growth plate fractures are few. They amount to the unusual situations in which the risks of sedation or general anesthesia are believed to dramatically outweigh the potential benefits of growth plate fracture reduction.

Relative contraindications for growth plate fracture reduction would be SH I or II fractures with clinically insignificant displacement. Also, fractures with greater displacement that present late (>1 week after injury) should not be manipulated. In such cases, the risks of the additional force that would have to be exerted on the growth plate must be weighed against the likelihood of spontaneous remodeling of the fracture over time or performing an osteotomy later after growth has ceased.

Next:

Nonoperative Therapy

Closed reduction, casting, and splinting

Very commonly, growth plate (physeal) fractures can be treated nonoperatively. Factors that affect treatment decisions include the following:

  • Severity of the injury
  • Anatomic location of the injury
  • Classification of the fracture
  • Plane of the deformity
  • Patient age
  • Growth potential of the involved physis

Most SH I and II injuries can be treated with closed reduction and casting or splinting and then reexamination in 7-10 days to evaluate maintenance of the reduction.

Some sites, such as the proximal humerus and clavicle, have excellent potential to heal and remodel even with severe-appearing deformity.

As an illustrative example of proximal humerus remodeling, a 7-year-old boy presented with a deformed proximal humerus fracture (see the first image below). The fracture healed with abundant callus but with deformity (see the second image below). Excellent remodeling was already seen at 2-year follow-up (see the third image below).

Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Angulated proxim Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Angulated proximal humerus fracture in child (anteroposterior and Y views).
Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Healed proximal Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Healed proximal humerus with abundant callus and angulation in child.
Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Remodeling of pr Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Remodeling of proximal humerus fracture in child.

Closed reductions through manipulation and traction must be performed carefully, with the patient (and the involved musculature) as relaxed as possible in order to avoid unnecessary wrestling of the bony components that may lead to grating of the physis on sharp metaphyseal bone fragments and potential iatrogenic damage to the physis. In an uncooperative patient (or one with significant pain or muscle spasm), reduction under anesthesia is preferred.

Less-than-satisfactory reductions are preferred to repeated attempts at reduction that may damage the germinal layer of cells within the physis. To avoid physeal damage, efforts at reduction should focus more on traction and less on forceful manipulation of the bone fragments.

Disruption of the physis may warrant restoration of its congruency to ensure proper joint mechanics. Angular deformities may occur as a consequence of malreduction or partial growth arrest. The location and direction of the deformity must be considered in planning treatment. In general, greater angular deformity can be tolerated in the upper extremity than in the lower extremity, more valgus deformity can be tolerated than varus, and more flexion deformity can be tolerated than extension. Rotation is not well tolerated, especially in the lower extremity.

More proximal deformities of the lower extremity are better compensated for than distal deformities (with ankle deformities least well compensated of all). Spontaneous correction of angular deformities is greatest when the asymmetry is in the plane of flexion or extension (ie, the plane of joint motion), with function often returning to normal unless the fracture occurs near the end of growth.

The age of the patient at the time of injury is of paramount importance in helping predict clinical outcomes because more correction can be anticipated in younger patients. Thus, growth arrest in 14- to 15-year-old girls or 17- to 18-year-old boys is of little consequence in terms of limb length, given the limited growth potential, but can be very important in terms of malunion. Younger children with full growth potential can correct more deformity, but a growth arrest leading to shortening can be more devastating.

Tissue engineering

Most of the research into cartilage regeneration has focused on articular cartilage, but some of this research may be applicable to growth plate cartilage as well. At present, no reliable means of regeneration exists. Cartilage cannot regenerate itself, partly because of its low cellularity and lack of vascular supply. In addition, chondrocytes in articular cartilage are well differentiated, and multipotent progenitor cells are relatively few. Thus, cartilage can heal the margins of damage but does not form a scar to join the defect edges together.

Many tissue-engineering strategies have been developed (eg, implantation of chondrogenic cells at various developmental stages into the defect site, implantation of cartilage itself [osteochondral autograft/mosaic arthroplasty], cartilage transplantation, and allogenic grafts). Periosteal and perichondrial tissue grafts have been considered for their stockpile of multipotent osteochondral progenitor cells. Scaffolding to provide a substrate for chondroprogenitor cell attachment and migration across cartilaginous defects has been studied as well.

These techniques have had variable success. Tissue scaffolding has proved effective at overcoming some deficiencies in tissue engineering. Collagen, a natural tissue, and poly-lactide-co-glycolide (PLGA), a polymer that elicits small acute immune responses, have shown promise as cartilage repair scaffolds. Chitin has been determined to be effective as a scaffolding for attaching and carrying stem cells for the repair of growth plate defects.

Some studies have combined gene therapy and tissue-engineering to regenerate articular cartilage in the hope of applying this approach to epiphyseal cartilage repair. One study used a retroviral vector to introduce human bone morphogenic protein (BMP)-7 complementary DNA into periosteal-derived rabbit mesenchymal stem cells. BMP-7 stimulates synthesis of type II collagen and aggrecan. Grafts containing modified cells consistently showed complete or near-complete articular cartilage regeneration at 8 and 12 weeks; control grafts showed poor regeneration.

The future also holds promise for specific intracellular signaling approaches to posttraumatic disturbances of the growth plate. Leboy et al found that important regulators of physeal chondrocyte hypertrophy include special BMPs: activated cytoplasmic proteins (called Smads) and multifunctional transcription factors (called Runx proteins). [20]

Another potent stimulator of embryonic epiphyseal cartilage is growth differentiation factor (GDF)-5. Buxton et al found that GDF-5 promoted both cell adhesion and proliferation during limb development. [21]

Previous
Next:

Options for Surgical Therapy

Open reduction and internal fixation or closed reduction and percutaneous fixation

More severe injuries, especially those involving intra-articular fractures, typically require anatomic reduction with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) that avoids crossing the physis. Unstable fractures that are suitable for closed reduction will benefit from percutaneous pin fixation to maintain the reduction. Smooth pins should parallel the physis in the epiphysis or metaphysis, avoiding the physis. Oblique application of pins across the physis should be considered only when satisfactory internal fixation is unattainable with transverse fixation. Any internal fixation devices should be easily removable yet adequate for internal fixation.

Special considerations during surgery include avoiding further damage to the growth plate by avoiding periosteal stripping and using smooth pins (screws or threaded pins across the physis should be avoided). The surgeon should also avoid forceful manipulation.  

Physis-sparing techniques must be used in skeletally immature patients. [7]

As an illustrative example, a skeletally immature patient presented with SH type II fracture of the distal femur (see the first image below). An anatomic closed reduction was obtained (see the second image below) and then held with percutaneous pin fixation (see the third image below). The fracture healed uneventfully (see the fourth image below).

Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Displaced Salter Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Displaced Salter-Harris II fracture of distal femur.
Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Anatomic reducti Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Anatomic reduction of previously displaced Salter-Harris II fracture of distal femur.
Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Percutaneous int Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Percutaneous internal fixation of Salter-Harris II fracture of distal femur after anatomic stable closed reduction.
Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Healed Salter-Ha Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Healed Salter-Harris II fracture of distal femur in anatomic position.

SH V fractures are rarely diagnosed acutely, and treatment is often delayed until the formation of a bony bar across the physis is evident. A high level of clinical suspicion is necessary to detect this complication early. In many cases, "early" may mean 6 months or more after the injury. Intra-articular stepoffs will not remodel. Long-term follow-up may be indicated for even benign-appearing fracture patterns.

Growth-plate transplantation

Several experiments have been performed to evaluate the efficacy of interpositioning materials (eg, bone wax, fat, cartilage, silicon rubber, and polymethylmethacrylate) into defects resulting from physeal bar excision. No single material is superior in the prevention of physeal bar reformation. Cartilage may prove ideal, and several possible sources for graft material exist, but each has associated difficulties, including the following:

  • Apophyseal cartilage may lack the growth potential of epiphyseal cartilage
  • Laboratory-procured chondrocyte allograft transplants may take a long time to develop and may not have any real possibility for interhuman transfer, because of the impending immune response
  • In physeal cartilage transfer, difficulties abound in procuring and transferring physes from one site to another
Previous
Next:

Treatment of Physeal Fractures in Lower Extremity and Hip Joint

Distal femur fractures

Distal femur fractures account for approximately 1-5% of all growth plate (physeal) fractures. The distal femoral physis is the fastest-growing physis in the body and provides 35% of lower-extremity leg length. [17]  This physis closes asymmetrically and is weaker during adolescence, when most SH III physeal injuries occur. Younger patients are more likely to have SH II fractures. [17]  As many as 40% of patients have complications, especially those with high-energy injuries and greater fracture displacement. [22]  

Displacement of the fracture in the sagittal plane may be associated with neurovascular injury in the popliteal fossa and instability on closed reduction. A common mechanism of injury is hyperextension causing anterior displacement of the epiphysis. Physeal fracture displacement in the coronal plane is not associated with other injuries, and the joint may be stable after closed reduction. [23] The irregular undulating shape of the distal femur physis makes perfect reduction difficult, leading to a high incidence of bony bar formation, which can cause premature physeal closure resulting in angular deformity and leg-length discrepancy. [17]

The treating clinician must also search for associated injuries, including anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears, which can occur in 8% of patients with intra-articular physeal injuries of the distal femur. [17]

Clinically, the thigh may appear angulated and shortened as compared with the contralateral thigh; and pain, knee effusion, and soft-tissue swelling usually are severe. Hemarthrosis may be more severe in SH III and SH IV fractures, and vascular examinations may reveal diminished or absent distal pulses. Neurologic symptoms also may be evident distally as a consequence of disruption of the posterior tibial and common peroneal nerve distributions. Intra-articular fractures are frequently missed, and advanced imaging may be required for diagnosis. [17]  

Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Anteroposterior Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Anteroposterior and lateral views of distal femur Salter-Harris III fracture where fracture is not well seen.
Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Oblique view of Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Oblique view of distal femur reveals Salter-Harris III fracture of distal femur.

Injuries to the distal femoral physis may result in angular deformities. Certain levels of angulation are acceptable. Posterior angulation up to 20° remodels in children younger than 10 years; however, injuries in adolescent patients do not remodel, and these patients do not tolerate this degree of angulation. Varus and valgus angulation or rotational deformity greater than 5° is not acceptable for the distal femoral physis, because there is no significant coronal plane remodeling.

Treatment of distal femoral physeal fractures varies according to severity of injury. Nondisplaced SH I or SH II fractures, in nonobese young patients in reliable families, can be treated by means of splinting with a hip spica cast.

Any displaced fracture or a fracture in which there is concern about late displacement is best treated with closed reduction under anesthesia, followed by smooth Kirschner wires (K-wires) or Steinman pins (depending on patient size) for SH I fractures and transverse metaphyseal lag screws (commonly placed percutaneously) for SH II fractures. [24, 25]  If an anatomic closed reduction cannot be obtained, careful open reduction, with care taken to minimize additional damage to the peripheral physis, is necessary.

The images below illustrate an SH II fracture of the distal femur that was treated with closed reduction and percutaneous pin fixation.

Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Displaced Salter Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Displaced Salter-Harris II fracture of distal femur.
Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Percutaneous int Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Percutaneous internal fixation of Salter-Harris II fracture of distal femur after anatomic stable closed reduction.
Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Healed Salter-Ha Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Healed Salter-Harris II fracture of distal femur in anatomic position.

An alternative fixation method that may be employed when the Thurston Holland fragment is small is cross-pinning (see the image below).

Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Anatomic reducti Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Anatomic reduction with percutaneous cross pinning of Salter-Harris II fracture distal femur.

SH III and SH IV injuries usually require anatomic reduction (which cannot be obtained with closed reduction) and are very often unstable. Operative treatment is required because even slight residual displacement can result in formation of a bone bar that causes limb-length discrepancy and angular deformity. An SH III fracture is commonly treated with transverse lag screws across the epiphysis (see the images below).

Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Oblique view of Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Oblique view of distal femur reveals Salter-Harris III fracture of distal femur.
Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Fixation of Salt Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Fixation of Salter-Harris III fracture of distal femur.

Complications of distal femur fractures include growth arrest (partial or complete) with progressive angulation, shortening, or both in 30-80% of patients. Physeal fractures of the distal femur (particularly the common SH I and SH II fracture patterns) have been shown to be associated with an approximately 50% rate of growth disturbance. [26] Leg-length discrepancy and angular deformity are common. [17]

The distal femur is the last physis to fuse and contributes 1 cm per year of femur length. (The distal femur epiphyseal plate contributes 70% of final femur length and 40% of overall lower-extremity length.) The distal physis fuses between 14 and 16 years of age in girls and between 16 and 18 years of age in boys.

Because the incidence of growth arrest is high, even with satisfactory reduction, a lower-extremity limb-length discrepancy of more than 2 cm may develop in one third of patients. Shortening and angulation are related more to the degree of initial displacement than to the accuracy of the reduction. An angulation deformity of more than 5° may develop in one third of patients. A persistent angular deformity in the coronal plane may not correct spontaneously with further growth.

Proximal tibia fractures

Whereas fractures involving the tibia and fibula are the most common lower-extremity pediatric fractures, those involving the proximal tibial physis are among the most uncommon; these injuries account for fewer than 1% of physeal injuries because the proximal tibia growth plate is protected by ligamentous attachments and the fibular head.

When these physeal injuries are fractured, however, they have the highest rate of complications. When posterior displacement occurs, the popliteal artery is vulnerable. At the tibial metaphysis, the artery is just posterior to the popliteus muscle. Moore and Mackenzie found that half of SH I injuries are nondisplaced and are diagnosed by means of stress radiographs. [27]  Apophyseal growth disturbance is rare past the age of 11 years. Genu recurvatum is the most frequent growth deformity, especially in patients younger than 11 years. (See the images below.)

Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Proximal tibia a Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Proximal tibia apophyseal avulsion fracture (anteroposterior, lateral, and oblique images).
Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Proximal tibia a Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Proximal tibia apophysis avulsion as seen on CT.
Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Fixation of prox Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Fixation of proximal tibia apophysis avulsion fracture (healed).

Generally, these fractures occur between 11 and 14 years of age, more often in boys, but SH I injuries typically occur earlier (average age, 10 years). SH II is the most common type, and one third of these fractures are nondisplaced. SH III injuries are often associated with lateral condyle fractures or medial collateral ligament (MCL) injury. SH IV injuries are often associated with angular deformity. SH V injuries are usually diagnosed retrospectively. Anterior physis closure or tibial tuberosity apophysis closure can cause significant genu recurvatum.

The image below illustrates a procurvatum deformity of the proximal tibia after repair of a proximal tibia apophyseal avulsion.

Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Procurvatum of p Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Procurvatum of proximal tibia after open reduction and internal fixation of proximal tibia apophysis injury.

If the fracture is nondisplaced or an anatomic stable reduction can be obtained with closed manipulation, treatment consists of an above-knee cast for 4 weeks. Generally, treatment of displaced apophyseal fractures requires ORIF.

Complications of these injuries include vascular insufficiency and peroneal nerve palsy, usually transient, and malunion. The proximal tibial physis contributes 0.65 cm of growth per year, resulting in 45% of the length of the tibia and 27% of the length of the lower extremity. The secondary ossification center of the tibial tuberosity apophysis develops at about 7-9 years of age and fuses between 13 and 15 years in girls and between 15 and 19 years old in boys. It is the last portion of the proximal tibial physis to close.

Overuse physeal injuries

Osgood-Schlatter disease and Sever disease represent 18% of pediatric overuse conditions. Osgood-Schlatter disease is a chronic apophysitis at the patella tendon insertion on the tibial tuberosity, usually seen in girls 8-13 years old and in boys 10-15 years old. Sever disease is a chronic apophysitis at the Achilles tendon insertion, usually seen in boys 8-12 years old. [28]

Distal tibia and fibula fractures

Fractures of the distal end of the tibia in children often involve the physis. They are of particular importance because partial growth arrest can occur and result in angular deformity, lower-extremity limb-length discrepancy, incongruity of the joint surface, or a combination of these. Triplane and Tillaux fractures are the two distinct types of distal tibial fractures. [7]

In a triplane fracture classification, two types of fractures exist: two-part and three-part fractures. A two-part fracture is a type of SH IV fracture that primarily occurs when the medial portion of the distal tibial epiphysis is closed.

A three-part fracture is a combination of SH II and SH III fractures that occurs when only the middle portion of the distal tibial epiphysis is closed. It involves fracture of the anterolateral portion of the epiphysis of the distal tibia (similar to Tillaux fracture) and fracture of a large fragment comprising the posterior and medial portions of the tibial epiphysis plus a large metaphyseal fragment of variable size; the fibula also may be fractured. These injuries most commonly occur just before epiphyseal closure and are due to external rotation forces.

The images below illustrate a triplane fracture of the distal tibia.

Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Triplane fractur Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Triplane fracture of distal tibia (anteroposterior and lateral images).
Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Sagittal and axi Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Sagittal and axial CT images of triplane fracture of distal tibia.
Growth plate (physeal) fractures. 3D CT images of Growth plate (physeal) fractures. 3D CT images of triplane fracture of distal tibia are useful for preoperative planning.
Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Healed triplane Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Healed triplane fracture of distal tibia after internal fixation.

Tillaux fractures are SH III fractures involving avulsion of the anterolateral tibial epiphysis. This portion of epiphysis is involved because the physis of the distal tibia closes first in the middle, then in the medial portion, and finally in the lateral portion. This injury occurs in older adolescents (eg, 12-15 years), after the middle and medial parts of the epiphyseal plate have closed but before the lateral part closes. Because it occurs in adolescents with relatively mature growth plates, there is minimal potential for deformity due to growth plate injury.

The images below are from a child with Tillaux fracture of the distal tibia.

Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Tillaux fracture Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Tillaux fracture of distal tibia seen on anteroposterior radiograph.
Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Healed Tillaux f Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Healed Tillaux fracture of distal tibia after internal fixation.

Treatment of displaced SH III and SH IV fractures of the distal tibia requires open reduction. This injury leads to premature physeal closure unless it is anatomically reduced. Development of an angular deformity is possible. Varus deformities, secondary to an osseous bridge formation on the medial aspect of the plate, are the most common complications found with distal tibia growth plate injuries. Limb shortening is the second most common problem associated with these injuries.

Kling et al, evaluating distal tibial physeal fractures that required open reduction, suggested that SH III, SH IV, and perhaps SH II fractures of the distal end of the tibia commonly cause disturbance of growth in the tibia and that closed or open anatomic reduction of the physis may decrease the incidence of these disturbances of growth, including shortening and varus angulation of the ankle. [29]  SH IV fracture of the distal tibia has indeed been associated with premature physeal closure unless it is anatomically reduced, usually with internal fixation.

A high rate of premature physeal closure (PPC) has been reported to occur in SH type I or II fractures of the distal tibia. Rohmiller et al reported a PPC rate of 39.6% in SH type I or II fractures of the distal tibia physis and determined that fracture displacement following reduction was the most important determinant of PPC development. [8]

Barmada et al investigated the incidence and predictors of PPC after distal tibia SH I and II fractures and found that when residual gapping of the physis was greater than 3 mm following reduction, the incidence of PPC was 60%; when the physeal gap was less than 3 mm, there was a 17% incidence of PPC. Upon open reduction of residual gapping, the periosteum was found to be entrapped within the physis, thereby preventing closure of the gap and preventing appropriate recreation of the anatomy. [30]

Russo et al performed a retrospective study of 96 patients presenting with displaced SH II fracture who were initially treated with closed reduction. [31]  Patients with less than 2 mm of postreduction displacement were treated with a nonweightbearing long leg cast (LLC; group 1). Those with 2-4 mm of displacement were treated with either LLC (group 2) or ORIF with removal of any interposed tissue (group 3). Those with more than 4 mm of displacement were treated with ORIF (group 4).

Of the 14 patients in group 1, 29% had a PPC and 7% had to undergo a subsequent procedure (eg, epiphysiodesis or osteotomy). [31]  Of the 33 patients in group 2, 33% had a PPC and 15% had to undergo a subsequent procedure. Of the 11 patients in group 3, 46% had a PPC and 18% had a second procedure. Of the 38 patients in group 4, 55% had a PPC and 23% had a subsequent procedure. No statistically significant differences in the rates of PPC or subsequent surgery were observed between groups.

Distal fibula growth plate fractures may be associated with distal tibia fractures or may occur without an associated tibia fracture. Treatment is nonoperative if the fracture is nondisplaced or if a stable closed reduction can be obtained but may be operative in unstable ankle patterns (with associated syndesmotic injury, a displaced distal tibia fracture, or both). [32]

Medial malleolus fractures have a 38% risk of growth arrest.  Salter I fracture of the distal fibula is the most common pediatric fracture in the ankle region.  It may be difficult to differentiate from a sprain but when not displaced, the treatment is the same – immobilization in a walker boot for 3-4 weeks. [7]

Triradiate cartilage fractures

Traumatic disruptions of the acetabular triradiate cartilage occur infrequently and may be associated with progressive acetabular dysplasia and subluxation of the hip. The volume of cartilage in a child's acetabulum allows a greater capacity for energy absorption than in adults. Thus, in children, fractures of the acetabulum are consistently the result of high-energy trauma. Unfortunately, a younger age at the time of injury is associated with a greater chance of developing acetabular dysplasia. (See the images below.)

Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Triradiate carti Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Triradiate cartilage fracture seen on anteroposterior pelvis x-ray.
Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Triradiate carti Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Triradiate cartilage fracture seen on axial CT.

Disruption of the acetabular triradiate cartilage in patients older than 12 years results in minimal subsequent growth disturbance; however, in younger patients, acetabular growth abnormality is a frequent complication. Growth abnormalities include shallow acetabula and progressive subluxation of the hip.

Triradiate cartilage injuries occurring during adolescence result in fewer growth changes in acetabular morphology and hip joint congruencies. However, in younger children, especially those younger than 10 years, acetabular growth abnormality is a frequent complication of this injury and may result in a shallow acetabulum similar to that seen in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH).

By the time patients reach skeletal maturity, disparate growth increases the incongruity of the hip joint and may lead to progressively more severe subluxation of the hip. Acetabular reconstruction may be necessary to correct the gradual subluxation of the femoral head.

Bucholz et al found nine patients with triradiate physeal-cartilage injury who were classified according to the degree of displacement and the probable type of growth-plate disruption. [33]  They determined that two main patterns of injury occurred. The first was a shearing (SH I or II) growth mechanism injury, with central displacement of the distal portion of the acetabulum. This injury pattern seemed to have a favorable prognosis for continued normal acetabular growth, though occasional premature closure of the triradiate physes occurred.

The second injury pattern appeared to be a crushing SH V growth mechanism injury; this type has a poor prognosis, with premature closure of the triradiate physes occurring secondary to the formation of a medial osseous bridge. [33]  Prognosis is dependent on the age of the patient at the time of injury and on the extent of chondro-osseous disruption.

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis

Slipped capital femoral epiphysis is a special case of a progressive overuse growth plate injury.  It should be differentiated from an acute traumatic proximal femur epiphysis SH I fracture.

Foot fractures

Accessory ossicles in the foot are common in skeletally immature patients and usually fuse with the secondary ossification center at skeletal maturity, but they may persist in adults. The os trigonum and accessory navicular ossicles are seen in about 20% of children and may become symptomatic. Treatment is usually nonoperative, though excision may sometimes be required. [7]

Stubbed great toe/phalanx fractures

The images below illustrate the respective radiographic and clinical appearances of an injury that has been termed the pediatric stubbed great toe. It is a somewhat occult open fracture because the growth plate of the distal phalanx is remarkably close to the nail plate. When a subungual hematoma occurs in conjunction with a growth plate fracture, this does in fact represent an open fracture. Phalangeal fractures are usually SH I or II fractures: when the distal phalanx is involved, there is the potential for nail bed injury. [7]

Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Radiographic evi Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Radiographic evidence of pediatric stubbed great toe.
Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Clinical appeara Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Clinical appearance of pediatric stubbed great toe. Note subungual hematoma, representative of open fracture.

In the great toe (or, at times, the lesser toes), this injury has been termed a Pinckney fracture or Pinckney lesion. [34]  In the hand, such fractures of the terminal phalanx may be called Seymour fractures. [35]

Previous
Next:

Treatment of Physeal Fractures in Upper Extremity

Proximal humerus fractures

Proximal humerus fractures have a high propensity for remodeling, and severe-appearing deformity can be accepted with the expectation that adequate remodeling will occur in the skeletally immature patient. (See the images below.)  The proximal humerus physis contributes 80% of growth for the upper extremity. The physis fuses between 14 and 17 years in females and between 16 and 18 years in males. [2]

Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Angulated proxim Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Angulated proximal humerus fracture in child (anteroposterior and Y views).
Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Healed proximal Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Healed proximal humerus with abundant callus and angulation in child.
Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Remodeling of pr Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Remodeling of proximal humerus fracture in child.

Elbow fracture

Because ossification rates for the physes at the elbow are highly variable, clinicians should obtain x-rays of the opposite side when evaluating the physes at the elbow. [2]

Supracondylar fractures are the most common type of elbow fracture in children. Long-term follow-up is required.

Radial head fractures can usually be treated in a closed fashion if there is less than 4 mm of translation and less than 30-60º of angulation. Radial head fractures may be difficult to diagnose without adequate x-ray images. (See the images below.)

Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Radial head frac Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Radial head fracture in child that is difficult to see on standard anteroposterior and lateral images.
Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Radial head frac Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Radial head fracture in child that was difficult to see on anteroposterior and lateral images is now well seen on oblique view.

ORIF is often indicated for radial head fractures (see the image below). Closed reduction with percutaneous internal fixation may be possible. With either approach, the surgeon should beware of the posterior interosseous nerve. The radial head should never be excised in children. Even a "dead head" can act as a spacer and allow more normal elbow development.

Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Open reduction a Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Open reduction and internal fixation of radial head fracture in child.

Distal radius and ulna fractures

Physeal injuries of the distal ulna occur much less frequently than those of the distal radius, but the former are associated with a higher incidence of growth arrest because the ulna derives 70-80% of its longitudinal growth from its distal physis. As a result, growth arrest can cause significant ulnar shortening. Some 44% of growth plate injuries involve the distal radius; 90% are type I or II and usually heal well. The physes close at about 18-20 years of age (though significant variation exists). In patients younger than 12 years, the treating provider can accept 20-25º angulation in the sagittal plane and 10-15º in the coronal plane.

The distal radial physis is the most frequently injured physis in children, usually in those aged 6-10 years. Children typically sustain the injury by falling on an outstretched hand. A great majority of these injuries are SH I and SH II fractures. The distal radial and ulnar physes provide 75-80% of total forearm growth; thus, potential for remodeling and correction of any deformity is excellent. [36]  However, as many as 7% can have significant growth disturbance. [37]

The acceptable amount of residual displacement for distal radial and ulnar fractures is not specifically known; however, 30% physeal displacement heals readily, and 50% displacement may often completely remodel in 1.5 years. Generally, distal radius fractures will remodel at 1º per month (0.9º or 9% per month in the sagittal plane and 0.8º or 11% per month in the coronal plane). [38]  The images below illustrate an SH I fracture with excellent remodeling after 6 months.

Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Salter-Harris I Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Salter-Harris I fracture of distal radius.
Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Healed and remod Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Healed and remodeled Salter-Harris I fracture of distal radius.

Treatment usually consists of either a long arm cast for 3 weeks followed by a short arm cast for 3 weeks or a short arm cast for 4-6 weeks.  Recommendations vary in the literature.

Closed reduction with percutaneous fixation (see the image below) or ORIF is indicated in uncooperative patients, including those with cerebral palsy or head injuries, patients with associated neurovascular injury, patients with ipsilateral supracondylar humerus fracture, and patients close to skeletal maturity in whom adequate remodeling is not expected. Complications of surgery include pin tract infection, extensor tendon rupture over a pin, and radial nerve injury (especially the sensory branch).

Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Closed reduction Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Closed reduction and percutaneous pinning of Salter-Harris II fracture of distal radius.

Lee et al found that significant distal radial growth disturbance occurred in about 7% of physeal fractures [37] ; the rate of distal ulnar growth arrest following physeal fracture (see the image below) is probably at least as high.

Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Growth retardati Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Growth retardation of distal ulna with negative ulnar variance after open reduction and internal fixation of distal radius fracture.

Epiphyseodesis of the distal ulna may be warranted to correct growth retardation of the distal radius with overgrowth of the distal ulna following distal radius fracture (see the images below). (See Complications.)

Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Posttraumatic Ma Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Posttraumatic Madelung deformity with ulna outgrowing radius in skeletally immature child.
Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Posttraumatic Ma Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Posttraumatic Madelung deformity treated with epiphyseodesis of distal ulna to allow radius growth to catch up.
Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Comparison views Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Comparison views of two wrists show almost equal ulnar variance (with correction of previously Madelung deformity by epiphyseodesis).
Previous
Next:

Physeal Injuries in Athletes

Growth plate (physeal) injuries in athletes constitute a special subset of growth plate injuries in general. 

In the United States, about 30 million children are involved in organized sports each year. The physis, as the weakest part of the bone, is highly susceptible to injury in young athletes; 15% of all pediatric sports injuries involve the physis. [28]  Many physeal injuries sustained by pediatric athletes represent overuse injuries from muscle imbalances. Such injuries might be prevented by participation limitation and sport-specific training focusing on flexibility, strengthening, and limiting of repetitive tasks (eg, overhead throwing). The most effective treatments for overuse physeal injuries are extended periods of active rest and joint immobilization when needed. [28]

Intense competition in young athletes can cause both acute and chronic injuries. [2]  In sports, neuromuscular fatigue can alter coordination and proprioception, thereby increasing susceptibility to injury. [39]  Single-sport specialization also increases abnormal stresses on the musculoskeletal system, resulting in a greater frequency of overuse injury, which frequently involves the physes. [40]  Because the developing physes are relatively weak as compared with the ligaments, injuries that might cause ligament damage in adults tend to cause physeal injury in the skeletally immature. [2]  

Male and female athletes tend to sustain different injuries, with different mechanisms of injury (see Table 1 below). [41]

Table 1. Physeal Injury Patterns in Male and Female Athletes (Open Table in a new window)

Mechanism and Site of Injury Males Females
Mechanism    
Acute trauma 58.2% 37.5%
Overuse 41.8% 62.5%
Site    
Lower extremity 53.7% 65.8%
Upper extremity 29.8% 15.1%
Spine 8.2% 11.3%

Injury type by anatomic site

The foot and ankle are the most commonly injured sites of the lower extremity in adolescent athletes. Injury patterns differ from those seen in adults because of the presence of growth plates. The os trigonum (a secondary ossification center of the talus) typically appears between the ages of 8 and 10 years in girls and between the ages of 11 and 13 years in boys, then fuses soon after. Acute fracture or repetitive microtrauma can cause pain from impingement. Athletes (including dancers, divers, and soccer players) are prone to activity-related chronic pain from impingement at the os trigonum.

Treatment consists of activity modification, anti-inflammatory medication, immobilization in severe cases, and physical therapy. [7]

About 39% of intra-articular distal femur pyseal fractures in athletes  (SH III or IV) are missed at initial presentation. [17]

Injury type by sport

Baseball

The overall motion and kinematics of throwing in adolescents are similar to those adults, in whom tremendous shear and rotatory stresses are generated across the shoulder and elbow, especially during pitching. [2, 28]  Avulsion fractures of the medial epicondyle are caused by extreme valgus loads with strong muscle contraction during the throwing motion and are especially common as the medial epicondyle physis begins to fuse. Inadequate treatment, or a too-early return to throwing, may lead to nonuion and failure of the physis to fuse, resulting in pain or instability.  Surgical repair of the medial epicondyle is indicated when there is valgus instability or displacement exceeding 5 mm. [2]   

The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) has recommended limiting the number of pitches per game to 60-100, with no more than 30-40 in a single practice session, and limiting the number of innings pitched to 4-10 per week. Athletes who throw with a sidearm motion are three times more likely to sustain an injury than overhead throwers; accordingly, sidearm throwing is not recommended. [2]

Little League shoulder is a condition involving epiphysiolysis (separation of the proximal humerus physis) due to repetitive microtrauma from overhead activity. Patients present with diffuse shoulder pain, usually in the dominant shoulder, which is aggravated by throwing motions. [2, 28] Risk factors include excessive pitch counts and fatigue. Pitchers throwing breaking pitches (eg, curveballs or sliders) are at higher risk. [28]

On examination, patients have tenderness and swelling over the anterolateral shoulder with weak abduction and internal rotation. X-rays show epiphyseal widening, especially on the anteroposterior (AP) image with the shoulder externally rotated. X-rays may also show irregularity of the physis and periosteal reaction. (See the image below.) 

Growth plate (physeal) injuries. Little League sho Growth plate (physeal) injuries. Little League shoulder. Note irregularity of proximal humeral physis with metaphyseal sclerosis.

Treatment consists of rest followed by gradual return to supervised throwing. The development of Little League shoulder can be prevented though improved technique and limitation of the number of pitches and innings. [2]

The term Little League elbow comprises several abnormalities of the elbow in the skeletally immature athlete, including avulsion fractures of the medial epicondyle, medial epicondyle apophysitis, accelerated medial epicondyle apophyseal growth, and delayed closure of the medial epicondyle growth plate. All of these injuries are the result of repetitive valgus stress and tension overload on the medial side of the elbow. [2]  Increased height and weight are risk factors. [28]

Growth plate (physeal) injuries. Little League elb Growth plate (physeal) injuries. Little League elbow. Note widening of medical epicondyle physis.

Patients usually present with medial elbow pain, decreased throwing accuracy, and reduced throwing distance. Patients may have tenderness over the medial epicondyle and occasional flexion contracture. X-rays may show irregular ossification of the medial epicondylar apophysis, with progression to apophyseal enlargement, separation, and fragmentation.

Treatment consists of rest and gradual return to throwing when symptoms have resolved. Patients should be subject to limitations on the number of pitches thrown and the number of innings pitched and should be taught proper mechanics. [2]

Racquet sports

Athletes playing racquet sports are susceptible to lateral apophysitis due to repetitive wrist extension, which causes repetitive microtrauma to the lateral epicondylar apophysis at the extensor tendon origin. Patients report pain and tenderness at the lateral epicondyle. Although x-rays may be normal, they may also show widening or fragmentation of the apophysis.

Treatment usually consists of rest, improvement of stroke mechanics, and adjustment of equipment size (especially the grip). Counterforce bracing may also be used to decrease stress at the extensor origin. [2]

Basketball

The proximal tibia physis is most commonly injured during basketball, especially in the setting of uncontrolled high-impact landings. Such injury is also related to taking off from jumps, eccentric muscle contraction with the knee in flexion, and sudden stop-and-go motions. [39]

Football

About 50% of distal femur physeal injuires in athletes occur during football; they are usually the result of a tackle where a valgus force is applied to the lateral aspect of the knee. [17]

Swimming

Physeal injuries seen in swimmers are similar to those seen in overhead baseball throwers. [2]

Soccer

Injury to the fifth metatarsal apophysis is common in soccer. The apophysis of the fifth metatarsal base appears at about 12 years for boys and 10 years for girls and fuses about 2-4 years later. The mechanism of injury is usually twisting of the ankle with a fixed forefoot and is due to traction by the peroneus brevis or the abductor digiti minimi.  Patients present with pain and swelling at the base of the fifth metatarsal.

Treatment consists of the use of a hard-soled shoe, walking cast, or boot for 6 weeks, followed by a return to the sport when the patient is pain-free and has normal motion and strength. [7]

Soccer players also have a high incidence of anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS) physeal injuries [28]

Gymnastics

  About 79% of pediatric gymnasts complain of wrist pain during practice or competition. The term gymnast wrist refers to premature closure of the distal radius physis from excess compressive loads during upper-extremity weightbearing in gymnastics. This condition is usually seen in 10- to 14-year-oldsm, especially during growth spurts. Limited training during growth spurts and gradual progression and variation of training loads may help limit the stress at the distal radius physis and and thus reduce the risk of developing gymnast wrist. [28]

Climbing

Epiphyseal injuries to the fingers (especially the middle and ring fingers) are common in adolescent rock climbers. Patients usually present with pain on the dorsal aspect of the proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint, which is often mistaken for a sprain.

Conservative treatment is usually successful, but healing takes an average of 7 weeks, with a range of 3-12 months before symptoms resolve. [42]

Previous
Next:

Complications

Limb-length discrepancy

Growth acceleration is a possible complication of physeal injuries; however, it is uncommon. This complication usually occurs in the first 6-18 months after the initial injury. The rapid healing of the physis enables an increased vascular response that is usually of shorter duration than that for healing of bony fractures. Accelerated growth patterns also may be associated with the use of implants and fixation devices that may stimulate longitudinal growth.The greater growth is rarely significant but does necessitate future assessment by the clinician, possibly until growth ceases.

Complete growth retardation or partial growth arrest may result in progressive limb-length discrepancies. Complete growth arrest is uncommon and depends on when the injury to the physis occurs in relation to the remaining skeletal growth potential. The younger the patient, the greater the potential for problems associated with growth.

If the expected leg-length discrepancy is less than 2.5 cm, the difference can usually be treated nonoperatively, with normal painless gait expected.  If the discrepancy is 2.5-5.0 cm, then treatment usually involves an epiphyseodesis of the longer limb to avoid producing disproportionate limbs if there is enough time for continued growth to correct the difference..

Careful follow-up and monitoring of the growth rate are needed to determine the optimal time for epiphyseodesis. Timing is very important: A procedure done too soon or too late can result in persistent leg-length discrepancy. Tools to estimate the best time for surgery include the growth remaining method of Anderson and Green and the straight-line graph of Moseley. The two methods are essentially equal in accuracy, but the Moseley method is more complicated and requires actual bone lengths over a prolonged period, therefore, it is useful only for young children.

Epiphyseodesis can be accomplished with a surgical staple crossing the growth plate. The advantage of a staple is that growth can resume after removal of the staple (although this is unpredictable).

Another technique is growth plate destruction, accomplished by drilling and grafting the epiphysis as described by Phemister and later by Anderson and Green. Advantages of growth plate destruction include a lower infection rate and less need for secondary operations than staples which can loosen or irritate soft tissues and require removal.

With either technique, repeat epiphyseodesis is sometimes required.

The images below show growth retardation of the distal radius relative to the distal ulna (posttraumatic Madelung deformity) after a distal radius SH I fracture, which was treated with epiphyseodesis of the distal ulna.

Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Posttraumatic Ma Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Posttraumatic Madelung deformity treated with epiphyseodesis of distal ulna to allow radius growth to catch up.
Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Comparison views Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Comparison views of two wrists show almost equal ulnar variance (with correction of previously Madelung deformity by epiphyseodesis).

If more than 5 cm of correction is desired, epiphyseodesis usually is not a treatment option, and the clinician may consider lengthening (or shortening) procedures. The images below are of a 14-year-old girl who had a leg-length discrepancy and was near skeletal maturity. She was treated with Ilizarov distraction osteosynthesis.

Growth plate (physeal) fractures. 14-year-old girl Growth plate (physeal) fractures. 14-year-old girl with leg-length discrepancy.
Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Application of I Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Application of Ilizarov external fixator frame with corticotomy for distraction osteogenesis correction of leg-length discrepancy.
Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Ilizarov distrac Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Ilizarov distraction osteogenesis for leg-length discrepancy.
Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Equal leg length Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Equal leg lengths (healing) after Ilizarov distraction osteogenesis.

Limb malalignment

Premature partial growth arrest is far more common and can appear as peripheral or central closures. These can result in angular deformities and limb-length discrepancies. Premature partial arrests are produced when a bridge of bone (bone bar or bridge) forms, connecting metaphysis to epiphysis and traversing the physis.

This bone bar inhibits growth, and its size and location determine the clinical deformity. For example, if the bar is located medially in the physis of the distal femur, the normal physis continues to grow laterally, producing a varus deformity (genu varum), and vice versa for a genu valgum deformity.

If adequate growth remains, bar resection may result in correction of the deformity.  If inadequate growth remains, osteotomy may be needed for deformity correction.

Investigation into gait analysis for patients with genu valgum deformity has revealed improvements in cosmesis and corrected joint kinematics with hemiphyseal stapling. Anterior bone bars in the distal femoral physis allow normal physeal growth posteriorly but result in a genu recurvatum deformity.

Similarly, central growth arrests result in tented lesions of the physis and epiphysis because of a central osseous tether with the metaphysis, resulting in the characteristic physeal coning. As the physis tries to push the epiphysis away from the metaphysis, the bony bridge hypertrophies in an effort to overcome the increased tension placed on it. Bone tissue under constant tension usually atrophies, but in this instance, a dense reactive cortical bone develops.

Some longitudinal growth may continue in patients with growth retardation, though at a much slower rate; thus, a progressive shortening of the limb occurs. Partial growth arrests may be visible on radiographs as early as 3-4 months after injury or may be delayed as long as 18-24 months. Follow-up checks may be necessary for 1-2 years after injury to monitor physeal healing and growth response.

Articular problems are also a possibility, particularly in physeal fractures that lead to discontinuities of the articular surface (ie, SH III and IV). These lesions can result in intra-articular stepoffs and early degenerative joint disease if they are not properly treated and anatomically reduced. Central growth arrest can promote the physeal tenting phenomena and, ultimately, result in a deformed articular surface.

The images below illustrate a distal tibia physeal malunion resulting in progressive growth deformity.

Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Salter-Harris V Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Salter-Harris V fracture pattern must be strongly suspected whenever mechanism of injury includes significant compressive forces. This is initial injury radiograph of child's ankle that was subjected to significant compressive and inversion forces. It demonstrates minimally displaced fractures of tibia and fibula with apparent maintenance of distal tibial physeal architecture.
Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Follow-up radiog Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Follow-up radiograph of ankle of child in preceding image. This radiograph depicts growth arrest secondary to Salter-Harris V nature of the injury. Note markedly asymmetric Park-Harris growth recovery line, indicating that lateral portion of growth plate continues to function and medial portion does not.

Again, timing is very important. The images below illustrate a proximal tibia apophysis avulsion fracture that developed malunion and was treated too late by means of staple epiphyseodesis. The patient required an osteotomy for correction of the deformity.

Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Procurvatum of p Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Procurvatum of proximal tibia after open reduction and internal fixation of proximal tibia apophysis injury.
Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Epiphyseodesis p Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Epiphyseodesis performed too late to correct procurvatum deformity of proximal tibia.

At 1 year follow-up, the patient had procurvatum of the distal femur with at least partial closure of the distal femoral physis (see the first image below). Workup included bone age studies (including left wrist x-rays and the Greulich Pyle atlas), which demonstrated that she was near skeletal maturity. Scanograms revealed 42 cm femur length on the right and 41.5 cm femur length on the left (see the second image below).

Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Growth arrest of Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Growth arrest of distal femur at skeletal maturity after Salter-Harris II fracture of distal femur.
Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Scanograms to as Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Scanograms to assess leg lengths after growth plate arrest following Salter-Harris II fracture of distal femur.

It was felt that excellent function could be restored with osteotomy without leg lengthening. The patient was too near skeletal maturity for success to be expected with epiphyseodesis. Osteotomy was successful, restoring position and length (see the image below).

Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Corrective osteo Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Corrective osteotomy after growth arrest deformity following Salter-Harris II fracture of distal femur.

Hardware complications

Hardware crossing the physis should be removed to prevent iatrogenic growth problems. In young children, hardware removal is commonly recommended; continued bone growth can bury hardware, making future removal (if needed) technically challenging. Painful hardware should also be removed. In older patients, hardware that is not causing symptoms can be left in situ.

The images below are from a patient with a healed SH III fracture of the distal femur who had pain from a screw head and washer. The pain resolved after removal of the hardware.

 Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Healed Salter-H Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Healed Salter-Harris III fracture of distal femur with pain over retained hardware (screw head).
Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Resolution of pa Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Resolution of pain after removal of hardware; healed Salter-Harris II fracture of distal femur.

Iatrogenic damage to trochanteric apophysis

Femoral rodding in adolescents carries the risk of closure of the greater trochanteric apophysis, as well as the risk of avascular necrosis of the femoral head.

Arthrofibrosis

Arthrofibrosis following intra-articular physeal injuries (SH III and IV) are not uncommon. For example, 20-30% of patients with distal femur intra-articular physeal injuries may develop loss of knee motion, especially flexion. Postfracture stiffness is less common in patients treated with bracing than those treated with casting; therefore, early mobilization is recommended. [17]

Previous
Next:

Long-Term Monitoring

Long-term follow-up is essential for determining whether complications will occur. Management of physeal fractures can thus be divided into two phases. The first phase involves ensuring bone healing, and the second phase involves monitoring growth.

Most growth plate (physeal) injuries should be reevaluated in the short term to ensure maintenance of reduction and proper anatomic relations. Some growth plate fractures are more problematic than others when it comes to the risk of growth arrest. Physeal fractures that are considered to be at increased risk for growth arrest include fractures to the following growth plates:

  • Distal femur [43, 17]
  • Distal tibia [44]
  • Distal radius and ulna
  • Proximal tibia
  • Triradiate cartilage

After initial fracture healing has occurred, physeal fractures require additional follow-up radiographs 6 months after injury, 12 months after injury, or both to assess for growth disturbance. It is reasonable to advise follow-up and educate patient family members as to the potential for growth abnormality, even with fractures that appear very benign; for example, SH V fractures may appear at initial evaluation to be less severe than they actually are. Follow-up is reasonable for a minimum of 12 months or until both the involved physis and the contralateral physis have closed. [17]

The images below are from a child with a minimally displaced SH III distal radius fracture (see the first image below) that was initially treated without surgery. Despite the benign appearance, a central growth arrest of the distal radius developed with posttraumatic arthritis at the scaphoradial articulation and positive ulnar variance as the ulna continued to grow (see the second image below). Ulnar epiphysiodesis and central par resection improved the ulnar variance and the appearance of the scapholunate interval (see the third image below), but posttraumatic arthritis persisted. Conceivably, the outcome might have been improved if the patient had been instructed to follow-up routinely sooner.

Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Minimally displa Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Minimally displaced Salter-Harris III fracture of distal radius.
Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Central deformit Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Central deformity of distal radius with growth retardation and relative lengthening of distal ulna after Salter-Harris III fracture of distal radius.
Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Partial correcti Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Partial correction of deformity (improvement of ulnar variance) after ulnar epiphyseodesis to correct growth retardation of distal radius following Salter-Harris III fracture. Earlier diagnosis and intervention might have improved results.

Growth plate injuries can occur even with diaphyseal fractures or injuries remote from the physes. Therefore, a high index of suspicion must be maintained and appropriate follow-up considered for any fracture in a growing child. It is essential always to be aware of the joint above and below any fracture.

As an illustrative example of growth arrest after remote injury, a 13-year-old skeletally immature boy presented with a midshaft tibia fracture (see the first image below) that was treated with closed reduction and casting and that apparently healed uneventfully (see the second image below). The patient returned 3 years later (at 16 years old) with knee pain and procurvatum deformity (see the third image below). Treatment of the angular deformity was successful after proximal tibia osteotomy (see the fourth and fifth images below).

Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Tibia shaft frac Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Tibia shaft fracture in child.
Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Healed tibia sha Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Healed tibia shaft fracture in child.
Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Comparison radio Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Comparison radiographic views (anteroposterior and lateral, both knees) showing procurvatum deformity of proximal tibia due to growth retardation remote from prior tibial shaft fracture.
Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Opening wedge os Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Opening wedge osteotomy to correct procurvatum deformity of proximal tibia.
Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Healed proximal Growth plate (physeal) fractures. Healed proximal tibia osteotomy.

Although it is impractical to follow all patients until skeletal maturity, at a minimum, the parents should be educated concerning the potential for long-term complications.

Previous